<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All apologies</title>
	<link>http://www.barber-college.org/2006/04/28/all-apologies/</link>
	<description>Killer Bees In Your Brain</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie T. Mishap</title>
		<link>http://www.barber-college.org/2006/04/28/all-apologies/#comment-282</link>
		<author>Sophie T. Mishap</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.barber-college.org/2006/04/28/all-apologies/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Meh.  I've had better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh.  I&#8217;ve had better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J-Ho</title>
		<link>http://www.barber-college.org/2006/04/28/all-apologies/#comment-281</link>
		<author>J-Ho</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 05:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.barber-college.org/2006/04/28/all-apologies/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>So, how close did I get? My Canadian spies aren't always the most reliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, how close did I get? My Canadian spies aren&#8217;t always the most reliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J-Ho</title>
		<link>http://www.barber-college.org/2006/04/28/all-apologies/#comment-280</link>
		<author>J-Ho</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 04:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.barber-college.org/2006/04/28/all-apologies/#comment-280</guid>
		<description>I've also been thinking it's time to launch a tactical warhead in response to all these anonymous posts.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'll just pick a random place somewhere in North America, just to send a message. I'm thinking... Canada. Yes, Canada. As for the province... Alberta will do nicely. We should probably pick a population center though... somewhere like Edmonton. I don't really want to blow up the airport per se, but if we moved a little ways south, we could probably find a nice spot... say, the corner of 107th Ave &#038; 105th St? It's pretty close to the hospital though. We should be careful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also been thinking it&#8217;s time to launch a tactical warhead in response to all these anonymous posts.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll just pick a random place somewhere in North America, just to send a message. I&#8217;m thinking&#8230; Canada. Yes, Canada. As for the province&#8230; Alberta will do nicely. We should probably pick a population center though&#8230; somewhere like Edmonton. I don&#8217;t really want to blow up the airport per se, but if we moved a little ways south, we could probably find a nice spot&#8230; say, the corner of 107th Ave &#038; 105th St? It&#8217;s pretty close to the hospital though. We should be careful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J-Ho</title>
		<link>http://www.barber-college.org/2006/04/28/all-apologies/#comment-279</link>
		<author>J-Ho</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 04:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.barber-college.org/2006/04/28/all-apologies/#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Hi Stephanie's 187th Creepy Anonymous Internet Stalker! Thanks for visiting our site! But leave the feuding to the experts, please!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Steph: I don't know why I'm giving you advice in the middle of a blog feud, but you should probably reign in your stupid stalkers. They're really, really making you look silly. If I had to describe them using a mathematical equation, it would be&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;STALKERISHNESS = 2((creepiness) + (frequency_of_comments)^2) * (average length of comment) * (dorkiness) * (age_of_stalker) * (ugliness) * (apparency_of_real-life_danger_posed))  * ((1/dignity) + (1/self-respect))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephanie&#8217;s 187th Creepy Anonymous Internet Stalker! Thanks for visiting our site! But leave the feuding to the experts, please!</p>
<p>Steph: I don&#8217;t know why I&#8217;m giving you advice in the middle of a blog feud, but you should probably reign in your stupid stalkers. They&#8217;re really, really making you look silly. If I had to describe them using a mathematical equation, it would be</p>
<p>STALKERISHNESS = 2((creepiness) + (frequency_of_comments)^2) * (average length of comment) * (dorkiness) * (age_of_stalker) * (ugliness) * (apparency_of_real-life_danger_posed))  * ((1/dignity) + (1/self-respect))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Shrieksalot, Holy Hand Grenade Bearer</title>
		<link>http://www.barber-college.org/2006/04/28/all-apologies/#comment-278</link>
		<author>Sir Shrieksalot, Holy Hand Grenade Bearer</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.barber-college.org/2006/04/28/all-apologies/#comment-278</guid>
		<description>The dog gag redux is lame boys.  In fact, it's ultra-lame.  And this has been pointed out to you before, by others.  And it's tasteless.   &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In fact, having conferred with Ms. Sophie on the specific topic of your original 'shooting her dog' gag, we both concurred it's lame to the meh degree.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Our hopes for you boys actually picked up the other day when we saw your fresh start with the sweat-shop gag.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But now we see your brash bravado was nothing more than a paper tiger. You bottle gobblers have caved and the true vacuum that is your intellectual wasteland is now laid bare for all to see.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So there you have it chumps.  It's pretty clear to all now that you've got nothing left to pump from the creative well.  You're left with recycling your own sorry concepts, with a predilection to the lame and the limp.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So why prolong your embarrassment any further?  Why not just run right over to Ms. Sophie's fine blog and let her know that you're out of gas?  After all, you won't be the first victim of her quill.  If that's any comfort...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dog gag redux is lame boys.  In fact, it&#8217;s ultra-lame.  And this has been pointed out to you before, by others.  And it&#8217;s tasteless.   </p>
<p>In fact, having conferred with Ms. Sophie on the specific topic of your original &#8217;shooting her dog&#8217; gag, we both concurred it&#8217;s lame to the meh degree.</p>
<p>Our hopes for you boys actually picked up the other day when we saw your fresh start with the sweat-shop gag.</p>
<p>But now we see your brash bravado was nothing more than a paper tiger. You bottle gobblers have caved and the true vacuum that is your intellectual wasteland is now laid bare for all to see.  </p>
<p>So there you have it chumps.  It&#8217;s pretty clear to all now that you&#8217;ve got nothing left to pump from the creative well.  You&#8217;re left with recycling your own sorry concepts, with a predilection to the lame and the limp.</p>
<p>So why prolong your embarrassment any further?  Why not just run right over to Ms. Sophie&#8217;s fine blog and let her know that you&#8217;re out of gas?  After all, you won&#8217;t be the first victim of her quill.  If that&#8217;s any comfort&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
